A Brush with Fame: The Ambiguous Market for Celebrity Art

We queue for their films and stream their music endlessly, but does their art deserve a place in the white cube? When celebrities take up the paintbrush, the results are often met with a mix of fascination and skepticism. In the art market, where authorship and intention are central, celebrity-made art occupies a curious position. On one hand, these works can appear as extensions of personal branding—another stage for fame to perform itself—raising doubts about authenticity and artistic merit. On the other, they could emerge from genuine impulses: philanthropy, self-expression, or the search for a creative outlet beyond their established careers. The results can be unpredictable: museum exhibitions, six-figure sales, or, occasionally, works that reveal surprising artistic integrity. From an art business perspective, the phenomenon urges us to question whether such art is primarily about skill—or solely about the market’s appetite for fame. 

 

Lucy Liu pictured in her studio. Photo Courtesy: Studio Lucy Liu. 

 

Accomplishment among celebrity artists is not universal but actress Lucy Liu, who you may remember from Charlie’s Angels, is often cited as a rare “success story.” Trained at the New York Studio School, Liu has steadily built credibility in the art world. Exhibitions of her mixed-media works have been shown at respected venues, including the National Museum of Singapore, and she has been praised for developing a visual language distinct from her acting career. Unlike many of her peers, Liu has managed to earn recognition on the strength of her technique, suggesting that persistence, education, and a serious commitment to practice can overcome initial skepticism. Similar to her in intention, singer Ed Sheeran is among the few celebrities who approach art from a place of humility. He has openly disclaimed any ambition to be “the next Pollock,” describing his recent Cosmic Carpark Paintings as simply the product of downtime and enjoyment. Exhibited at HENI Gallery in London earlier this year, these abstractions—created in a disused Soho car park—were priced at an accessible £900, with proceeds going to charity. Encouraged by friends Damien Hirst and HENI founder Joe Hage, Sheeran’s exhibition illustrates the ways fame can open doors to the commercial art circuit, even when the artistic practice itself remains modest. 

Meanwhile, there are those, like Adrien Brody, who attempt to pursue painting as a serious parallel career. His recent large-scale canvases, which rework familiar Pop art idioms from the 1960s, have been shown in galleries and private collections, as he deliberately cultivates a reputation as a visual artist—though critical reception has often been skeptical. By contrast, Welsh actor Anthony Hopkins has found a more commercially receptive niche, not only with his gestural paintings, but also through his foray into digital art; his 2022 NFT drop—1,000 pieces inspired by his film roles—sold out on OpenSea in under seven minutes, reportedly a platform record. While the project demonstrated how established celebrities can successfully leverage blockchain-based art markets, critics noted that it exemplified the ongoing commodification of artistic identity in the NFT era—where celebrity endorsement often overshadows aesthetic substance. 

 

Ed Sheeran working on Cosmic Carpark Paintings. Photo Courtesy: HENI. 

 

At the more performative end of the spectrum, this market embraces works that blur the line between serious practice and spectacle. Consider Snoop Dogg’s “Genesis Burn” series, produced in collaboration with Erica Kovitz and The Joint Venture. These canvases incorporate the remnants of joints smoked by Snoop himself, along with his signature and even marijuana ash. Auctioned in 2023 on the platform 32auctions, the works collectively raised over $148,000. Here, the art object is inseparable from the celebrity persona—more artifact than artwork, yet still highly valued by collectors. 

What explains this unevenness in reception? A key factor is provenance. Collectors often acquire celebrity works not solely for aesthetic appreciation but for the cultural cachet attached to ownership. A painting by recognized figure functions simultaneously as an artwork and as memorabilia, collapsing boundaries between fine art and pop culture. Provenance linked to stardom enhances exclusivity and resale potential, much as a handbag owned by Princess Diana commands more at auction than one fresh off the boutique shelf. 

 

Snoop Doggy Dogg Genesis Burn. Photo Courtesy: Joint Venture Art.  

 

Auction houses have long recognized this dynamic. Collections once owned by celebrities frequently outperform expectations. When Elizabeth Taylor’s art collection was auctioned at Christie’s in 2011, works by Van Gogh, Pissarro, and Degas soared in value, boosted by their association with Taylor. Similarly, items connected to musicians or actors—whether personal artworks or owned artworks—have become highly lucrative segments of the auction market. Art by David Bowie and Bob Dylan provide enduring cases: Dylan’s “Drawn Blank Series” watercolors and sketches, first exhibited in 2007, have remained staples at galleries and auctions. These examples reveal that celebrity art can sustain demand long after the initial novelty fades, particularly when tied to culturally iconic figures.

What the market rewards does not always align with formal innovation or critical acclaim. Critics regularly dismiss these works as amateurish or opportunistic, arguing that they bypass the established mechanisms of artistic development and validation. This tension places celebrity art in a liminal category: part fine art, part commodity. At the same time, celebrity art often expands audiences. Exhibitions by famous actors or musicians tend to attract visitors far beyond traditional art-world circles, serving as strategic entry points for new collectors and a broader public. Institutions and galleries may leverage such shows to boost footfall or visibility, even if the critical risk is high. This expansion of the collector base is not trivial; it suggests that celebrity art functions as an audience-development tool in an art market increasingly driven by experience, participation, and accessibility.

Still, important questions remain. Will such works sustain long-term collectability once the novelty fades or the celebrity’s cultural relevance wanes? Will they integrate into the canon of art history, or remain curiosities at the fringes of the market? Evidence so far is mixed: Bowie, Dylan, and Liu seem to have secured a degree of lasting legitimacy, while others remain vulnerable. Perhaps the most meaningful legacy of celebrity art lies not in reshaping artistic canons but in challenging our concept of value. These works may not revolutionize form or theory, but they force us to confront how markets assign worth—how fame, identity, and storytelling become inseparable from price. Whether dismissed as vanity projects or celebrated as cultural artifacts, celebrity-created art reveals the contemporary art market’s fascination with persona as much as with paint. 

In a sense, the debate over celebrity art echoes broader cultural questions. In my previous article analyzing Claire Dederer’s important book, Monsters, I reflected on whether audiences should separate the artist from their personal failings. A similar question arises here: should we separate the celebrity from the artist in order to judge the work on its own terms? Or is the fusion of such an identity and creative output precisely the point? Ultimately, celebrity art reminds us that the art market is not only a site of aesthetic judgment but also of storytelling, branding, and cultural consumption. 

Kritika Salhotra

Features Co-Editor, MADE IN BED


Bibliography 

“Adrien Brody’s Art Is Horrendous: Why Are People Pretending It Isn’t?” ARTnews, May/June 2025. https://www.artnews.com/art-news/artists/adrien-brody-art-eden-gallery-1234744419/

“Elizabeth Taylor Art Collection: Van Gogh, Pissarro, Degas Works Sell £14 m at Christie’s London.” Daily Mail, February 2, 2012. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2097612/Elizabeth-Taylor-art-collection-Van-Gogh-Pisarro-Degas-works-sell-14m-Christies-London.html

Goodbody, Liv. “Art in the Limelight: The Power of Celebrity Provenance at Auction.” MyArtBroker, last updated June 13, 2025. https://www.myartbroker.com/investing/articles/art-limelight-celebrity-provenance-auction 

Nigel Ip. “Review | Ed Sheeran: Cosmic Carpark Paintings – HENI Gallery, London.” Nigel Ip, July 10, 2025. https://nigelip.com/2025/07/10/review-ed-sheeran-cosmic-carpark-paintings-heni-gallery-london/. Nigel Ip 

“Snoop Dogg Reaches a New High at Auction.” Apollo Magazine, August 22, 2025. https://apollo-magazine.com/snoop-dogg-joints-art-auction-erica-kovitz/ 

Next
Next

Innocence of the Eye: what artists and galleries can learn from children